activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Pollack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (AMQNET-95) IMessageProducer contains methods for creating messages which is not in agreement with JMS API and .NET vendor specific messaging APIs
Date Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:35:52 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44779#action_44779
] 

Mark Pollack commented on AMQNET-95:
------------------------------------

As you can tell, I'd be more inclined to be as close to the standard spec as possible just
to avoid any confusion.  I ran across it while creating stub implementations for testing in
case that gives another perspective to the usage patterns involved with this extension.  I've
already felt that swapping out a TIBCO impl to use NMS was a bit more work than it should
have been, though this isn't one of those cases because I didn't have those calls to begin
with.  Other examples of 'a bit more work' is the use of message.body, message.properites,
and a few other odds and ends.  These are not 'major' issues, just wanted to hear your take
on the matter.



> IMessageProducer contains methods for creating messages which is not in agreement with
JMS API and .NET vendor specific messaging APIs
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQNET-95
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-95
>             Project: ActiveMQ .Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ActiveMQ Client
>            Reporter: Mark Pollack
>            Assignee: Jim Gomes
>             Fix For: 1.0
>
>
> The IMessageProducer interface contains CreateMessage, CreateTextMessage(), etc.   I
don't see why these are on the IMessageProducer interface as it quite non-standard.  I guess
there is a good reason for this but I can't think of one.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message