Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16125 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2008 14:39:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2008 14:39:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 61470 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2008 14:39:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 61291 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2008 14:39:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 61279 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2008 14:39:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:39:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of e.semog@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.156 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.156] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.156) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:38:07 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1756019fgg.44 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:38:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=KOsppDU/F+AD4mnRyS+WBmcJ5ioC9E5w4BPPCNVKYPI=; b=LyaRCRhLuuRxYn3joaRWCHMAjplLZguHU2Wy4+sM4aES1vcKY1ySbz6zqqRBAAhyxx GiIdmIoyNmQPlG3juBtdOyx8FIcxxGocNFhdBS/oADtgfi8ARMBwFIirZS0zbLI8h+ys 8Q6bvymwe1CFUX/zGViy475MNsnAumB4ALZ7Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=AoOZB1f1DrD2u42Q/uZshw9lp9mVNI/xXEooCteZlNkWdpQHDuhhuG4Wj24irGeyZf 6i74/VWKhly4NOh1Kh3bSUeSZNHw2kdrATypauMHORtnAZ1Suwb/gvWyLowMBTEZFbuf m6XoG63/BUx/iTszoY/l4m+JHhqhiiiTc11P4= Received: by 10.86.23.17 with SMTP id 17mr11574528fgw.44.1215873508984; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.92.13 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5a56ce1b0807120738x24778a29l733cce61d16baaf4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:38:28 -0700 From: "Jim Gomes" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: NMS The world of Silverlight In-Reply-To: <18347501.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3725_25650102.1215873508999" References: <18347501.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_3725_25650102.1215873508999 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I have not tried this, but the compiler seems reasonable. My understanding is that the Silverlight runtime is not the same as the CLR 2.0. You would need to need to compile them to target the Silverlight target runtime. Let me know what you are able to come up with, and I can possibly look into adding it as a compile option. Or if you can modify the NAnt build scripts and submit a patch, that would be great. -Jim On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Richard Gillingham < richard@richardgillingham.com> wrote: > > Hello all > > I've been thinking about Silverlight and decided tonight to try my NMS > client assemblies in a Silverlight 2 Beta project. The IDE complains that > the assemblies were not built against the Silverlight runtime. > > Has anyone tried this before?? > > If not, I'll go ahead and report back :) > > kind regards > > Richard > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/NMS-The-world-of-Silverlight-tp18347501p18347501.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------=_Part_3725_25650102.1215873508999--