activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Gomes" <e.se...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CMS and NMS failover
Date Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:23:19 GMT
Speaking for NMS, we have the failover support scheduled for version
1.1.  We are currently getting ready to release 1.0.  Top of the list
after that is failover.  As Nathan said, all patches and offers of
help (testing, documentation, reviews, etc.) are appreciated.

-Jim



On 6/6/08, Mittler, Nathan <nathan.mittler@sensis.com> wrote:
> Speaking for ActiveMQ-CPP (CMS), we do have an issue for this:
> http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-100
>
> However, nobody's really had the time to get around to the
> implementation.  If someone would like to step up, we'd be happy to take
> patches.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richard Gillingham [mailto:richard@richardgillingham.com]
>> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 1:40 PM
>> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
>> Subject: CMS and NMS failover
>>
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm working on a project using ActiveMQ with Delphi and C# clients.
> For
>> Delphi support I'm using some wrapper classes exported out of a custom
>> VC++
>> DLL using CMS.
>>
>> My question is:
>>
>> For each of NMS and CMS where is client failover support on their
>> respective
>> roadmaps??  Has anyone implemented any strategies in their own
> projects?
>>
>> One concern for example is a connection fails the child Sessions will
> be
>> freed along with their consumer,producers.  Once a new connection is
>> established the graph of producer/consumers will have to be rebuilt.
> This
>> is something I'd have expected to be covered in the product
>> implementation.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Richard
>> --
>> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/CMS-and-NMS-failover-
>> tp17700734s2354p17700734.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
View raw message