Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71863 invoked from network); 29 May 2008 02:08:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 May 2008 02:08:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 20756 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2008 02:08:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 20725 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2008 02:08:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 20714 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2008 02:08:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 May 2008 19:08:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 May 2008 02:07:39 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5140F234C12E for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 19:08:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1687609516.1212026880331.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 19:08:00 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mark Pollack (JIRA)" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (AMQNET-88) Missing method on IConnection In-Reply-To: <44647726.1212004440898.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=43091#action_43091 ] Mark Pollack commented on AMQNET-88: ------------------------------------ Perhaps I was too quick on the draw to create an issue, I now see that transactional is part of the AcknowledgementMode enum, which means that I should select that as the jms spec states that the ack mode 'ignored if the session is transacted'. I guess then the semantics to create a transactional session are still there, which is what I was concerned about. I'm not 100% sure though this actually makes things easier conceptually, being one other item to keep track of as we transliterate code from java-to-.net. Thoughts? > Missing method on IConnection > ----------------------------- > > Key: AMQNET-88 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-88 > Project: ActiveMQ .Net > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ActiveMQ Client > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Mark Pollack > Assignee: James Strachan > > Hi, > The JMS spec has the method > public Session createSession ( boolean transacted, int acknowledgeMode ) > on the Connection object. TIBCO EMS has this method as well. > the NMS API omits the boolean for creating a transacted session. I very much require this feature. any reason it was omitted? > Cheers, > Mark -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.