activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Timothy Bish (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (AMQCPP-176) Work around Visual Studio .NET 2003 covariant return issues
Date Tue, 27 May 2008 12:23:54 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=43042#action_43042
] 

Timothy Bish commented on AMQCPP-176:
-------------------------------------

Changing to code to remove the use of language features that have been in the standard for
a decade seems wrong to me.  

> Work around Visual Studio .NET 2003 covariant return issues
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQCPP-176
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-176
>             Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Albert Strasheim
>            Assignee: Nathan Mittler
>
> It would be very useful if something could be done in the AMQCPP code to work around
the issues Visual Studio .NET 2003 has with having base classes with virtual functions as
covariant return types.
> These problems are alluded to here:
> http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=23760&SiteID=1
> Some ideas have been discussed here:
> http://www.nabble.com/Unable-to-comile-C%2B%2B-client-on-VC%2B%2B-2003-td14680479s2354.html
> but I'm hoping there might be a way to slightly restructure the AMQCPP code instead of
resorting to preprocessor directives.
> Any ideas I could try would be much appreciated.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message