activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ namespace change
Date Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:42:17 GMT

On Apr 18, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:

> The problem is we update the schema every time a field is added to a
> Java bean.  So mostly likely we would have to version the namespace
> for every release.

Do you think that it's possible that there could be tools that are  
keyed off of a namespace?  Just wondering.

> BTW the namespace != to the xsd that defines it.  We currently do
> version the xsd's you can see them listed at:
> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core
>
> The user would just need to update his document's xsi:schemaLocation
> configuration to validate against the correct XSD.

Ahh, ok, that makes sense to me.  It's not likely that you'll need to  
mix two versions of AMQ in the same document.

Anyway, it's a faintly held opinion.


Regards,
Alan

>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com 
> > wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 18, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com 
>>> >
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree about version numbers in the URI but faintly hold that  
>>>> opinion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Problem is do we update the URIs everytime we release?  Sounds  
>>> like it
>>> would break folks.  What would the benefits be?
>>>
>>
>> Only if the schema changed.
>>
>> Someone might be working w/ an older schema for production work and  
>> a newer
>> schema for  a new thing that's being developed.  Having the same  
>> namespaces
>> would be a problem in their IDE.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> Open Source SOA
> http://open.iona.com
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message