activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (AMQ-1660) Scheduled Failover
Date Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:50:43 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=42434#action_42434
] 

Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-1660:
------------------------------------

Perhaps it would be better if we try to work around this problem with postgress so that you
don't have to restart your broker. (and if you did I would recommend you just use a cron job
to do that).

Wonder if we use 2 lock statements in 2 different transactions.  After some time we commit
transaction 1 and get the lock again.  Then we do the same with the 2nd transaction.  and
keep alternating.  This should avoid the old transaction problem.

We just need to deal with new brokers coming online and getting 1 of the locks while the master
is re-newing the lock.  So a salve need to release that lock fast if it can't get the 2nd
lock.

Make sense?

> Scheduled Failover
> ------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-1660
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1660
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.1, 5.0.0
>         Environment: all platforms that support a running standalone broker
>            Reporter: Rob Bugh
>
> I am using a JDBC Master/Slave topology. I'm using Postgres as the db and noticed that
due to the long running transaction of the master holding the lock on the activemq_lock table
my vacuums are not cleaning as many dead tuples as they could. If you are familiar with postgres
then you know that vacuum can only recover dead tuples up to the point of the oldest transaction.
My activemq database is on the same db server as my production db.
> So I would like to regularly failover the master to the slave to keep the lock transaction
timestamp moving forward in time.
> Is there any facility built into activemq that would allow me to schedule a restart of
a broker? For example, it would be nice to have the ability to specify in the broker.xml a
TTL value that would mean run for this much time then restart yourself (or shutdown).
> Rob

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message