activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Namespace Reorg
Date Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:56:42 GMT
Ok. The MSMQ should be taken care of now.  Thx!

On 11/1/07, Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, that is what I was going for.  I originally had not placed the
> Apache.NMS in a vendor sub-directory, but I'm OK with that.  I really like
> the external repository reference when doing a checkout.
>
> The other projects are easy to change as well, except for MSMQ.  It still
> had a dependency on the ActiveMQ project.  It was using the AtomicBoolean
> type.  In the patch file I posted to the [AMQNET-73] issue, I copied the
> AtomicBoolean.cs file into the MSMQ project so that it is independent of the
> ActiveMQ project.
>
> Yes, I see that the nant builds are necessary for full support.  For the
> most part, they can be avoided, but not ignored.
>
> Thanks for getting this set up.
>
> - Jim
>
> On 11/1/07, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ok.. I got it setup for the NMS.ActiveMQ module.  Easy enough.
> > Please let me know if that's what you were requesting.. I'll
> > replicated that to the other modules if it's what you were looking
> > for.
> >
> >
> > On 11/1/07, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > Ok.. I'll try out setting up the extenal vendor branch system.. I'll
> > > report back in a bit.
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Mime
View raw message