Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71599 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2007 16:24:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2007 16:24:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 94995 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2007 16:24:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 94827 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2007 16:24:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 94818 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2007 16:24:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:24:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:24:17 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IkMXs-0003ra-LV for dev@activemq.apache.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:56 -0700 Message-ID: <13367662.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Motl To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: ActiveMQ 5.0 producer flow control MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: motl@orcsoftware.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, "As of ActiveMQ 5.0, we can now individually flow control each producer on a shared connection without having to suspend the entire connection. Messages that are sent synchronously will automatically use per producer flow control." (http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html) Could you pin-point an issue regarding this new feature. I can't find any in the ActiveMQ 5.0 issue list. Thanks, Matvey -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5.0-producer-flow-control-tf4678521s2354.html#a13367662 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.