activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Albert Strasheim" <full...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: activemq: direct tcp connection
Date Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:58:37 GMT
Hello

What you could probably do in this case is to embed a broker either in the 
producer or the consumer, so the one of them communicates with the broker 
using the VM transport. The other one will can still talk to the embedded 
broker using the TCP transport.

However, if you have the producer or the consumer on the same machine as the 
broker, the overhead of TCP is probably minimal.

The embedded broker approach will work fine if both the producer and the 
consumer are Java, or if one of them is Java and the other is C++. If both 
your producer and consumer are C++, you will have to have a separate broker, 
because the C++ library is only a client library (i.e., there's no easy way 
to embed a broker inside your C++ program, and there isn't something like a 
VM transport).

Hope that helps.

Regards,

Albert

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Motl" <motl@orcsoftware.com>
To: <dev@activemq.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 8:05 PM
Subject: activemq: direct tcp connection


>
> Hi,
>
> If I need direct TCP connection for performance reasons, but still want to
> use JMS api, is it possible to do that in some way?
> Sorry for unclear question, but in some cases I only need 1 producer and 1
> consumer and I want direct TCP connection between them.
> If I could do it within activemq, less code will require changes on the
> caller side.
>
> I am asking about both java and c++ implementations.
>
> Thank you.
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/activemq%3A-direct-tcp-connection-tf4602430s2354.html#a13141078
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> 


Mime
View raw message