Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.229 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=rayBLw5LUk1LDzzFWdRrr5Ylkk7fsjEoxOHlYPgiTv4qVmj1G8zzOO0MAMjcZHoKl9kTojfLJ7D1ZVGVtY7GkOnQL27XZNTGNF22k7+l0VJBVc51UyQxYjqFUEul6shVZ1Q8qrrmz8P49gdwBH12dUtoK5v39Knxlui2zWQzxpQ=
Message-ID: <ec6e67fd0706110828r3de3fe43hd1e912944ff910a2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:28:40 +0100
From: "James Strachan" <james.strachan@gmail.com>
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org, dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: NMS
In-Reply-To: <1194ab690706110812k4d5951c3k6249ee639abf4cac@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1180708467.3366.107.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <a21e8c210706060634k6169dc5w2d5d9ce80154832e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <129a14790706060642y2264d47crea5cf0095a60a33d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a21e8c210706060656n57c45dd8l13f6431e2968d72e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <88f5d710706060741j3d279e77pd133bb2b65acdb4c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a21e8c210706060747p6c110aedwcae0b559396c6095@mail.gmail.com>
	 <88f5d710706060756ta6a4fbegd6fb9b994f9daf5b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1181554664.11403.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <af2843cd0706110626w71b9f49cge6740ac1b0f8bb23@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1194ab690706110812k4d5951c3k6249ee639abf4cac@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/11/07, John O'Hara <john.r.ohara@gmail.com> wrote:
> "..please consider that the same folks who developed NMS helped develop the
> AMQP specification so the same alleged 'taint' that is being claimed against
> NMS would also apply to AMQP."
>
> To clarify.
> James is not the source of any of the content of the AMQP specification thru
> v0-9, to the best of my knowledge.

So I've just been through my AMQP spec emails; The first version I was
sent was 0.3a4 in August 2004 then I contributed to the specification
up to around April 2005 when it had reached around 0.81a.

So what happened to the specification I worked on? Was a new group
formed excluding all the folks who were on the mailing list I was on
(including yourself John you were on the mailing list with me) and
were all versions of AMQP destroyed and a new cleanroom version
created after 0.81a, ignoring all that previous work?

-- 
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/