Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70736 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2007 10:12:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Jun 2007 10:12:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 90069 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2007 10:12:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 90047 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2007 10:12:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 90038 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2007 10:12:26 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 03:12:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.230 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.230] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 03:12:20 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so386997wxd for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 03:12:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PAlMZkVO26iNWHNCcfUNXX+aP1Few277tPEC/3Li4arANFm0PDLldor1y2TOlNWNEkKRvvvwkwW4ssFTzy6JFWKkVAIYz51dA4SuG5BTrdcO9lFNEoPFBIZYAkVfsF6QWfI/+6UQu6+2DaZiVaTp/I2cjXK/CMJQxTgDtK9cFkg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cZAPeZqVL7Kna5hUmOiwUELvCn/R6YDX+OtixaaWoBHo8LxTvadXPbEVguL6V3KRQjaD5ZFXpjItmIyahkP5prItW0TRdOzyA/W03IVmj2EVasHOKVxv9kNpuLfGP8f2rZPhiomH+PGWszkLcDKnnzqjGjphrWsh7HqYBCjUDXA= Received: by 10.90.28.13 with SMTP id b13mr1292952agb.1181211120091; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 03:12:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.67.18 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:11:59 +0100 From: "James Strachan" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Messages dividing between brokers In-Reply-To: <11003290.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <10989700.post@talk.nabble.com> <11003290.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6/7/07, Elber wrote: > > Thank you Hiram for the information, > But in my case, I'm using VMware hosts with the same performances (I've made > a copy). > What can make a consumer more slower than another in this case. > I'm using ActiveMQ 4.2 SNAPSHOT and the options: > conduitSubscriptions="false" & dynamicOnly="true". Consumers typically are not all gonna perform equally due to your OS, its thread scheduler, context switching etc etc. -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/