Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22888 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2007 17:19:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jun 2007 17:19:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 14722 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2007 17:19:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 14701 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2007 17:19:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 14683 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2007 17:19:02 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:19:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of erharold@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.177] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:18:58 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so1801777pyh for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:18:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=M9tpBqJe4WLcaSmgvuDyAC1poNoNiln8U7Sx6vse9mUmroCwXHeJ5BtAIswbNt7oeIvUeOKhXFACuGzZKj39E2bz7keOiqnPLn0JIeg67H6/fSOA2+A+OtfUOSLQxzchGCioTESCVPKGYzW3IG3r1/oFDHsb8EpWYEJTjJMDV9E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Gm0pB3e+3qbWGXjn8fx4fXHXQ5TD8/5bOylbHu/po1Z5s4lTsdMgmG3ZZi2jXSLwRSGxqAOKN9jLcjo2lpg915KLAj/fpDiGhe16Jlju1XZCjTg2e+dp1TVib4WQNuvvktj7IY3KKi8cWAChGrmNmQWLojMWG5U7AnQlvX+wnds= Received: by 10.65.194.13 with SMTP id w13mr5621493qbp.1181927916919; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.204.14 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49aa580c0706151018m64831c13n2ae2256836144fab@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:18:36 -0400 From: "Elliotte Harold" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] change the namespace URI in 5.0 onwards to map to spring URIs In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_50410_26740413.1181927916890" References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_50410_26740413.1181927916890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Versions in namespace are a common XML antipattern. They are rarely a good idea, as changing the namespace URI from one version to the next is rarely a good idea, and certainly doesn't happen as often as changing the schema. Namespaces should not be used for versioning. The W3C TAG has spent a lot of time on this. See: See http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning-xml -- Elliotte Rusty Harold erharold@gmail.com ------=_Part_50410_26740413.1181927916890--