Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50826 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2007 02:01:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jun 2007 02:01:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 78747 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2007 02:01:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 78713 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2007 02:01:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 78704 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2007 02:01:14 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:01:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:01:10 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DA27141EB for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <13741761.1182564048730.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:00:48 -0700 (PDT) From: "Albert Strasheim (JIRA)" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (AMQCPP-93) Performance analysis In-Reply-To: <20942071.1174226494454.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Albert Strasheim updated AMQCPP-93: ----------------------------------- Attachment: DataOutputStreamv0.patch Here's a patch for DataOutputStream that makes it significantly faster on bench2 (to be attached) when using Stomp. On my dual core Windows XP machine with ActiveMQ 4.1.1 and a Release build, it looks like it's at least 20-30% faster. > Performance analysis > -------------------- > > Key: AMQCPP-93 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-93 > Project: ActiveMQ C++ Client > Issue Type: Task > Affects Versions: 2.0 > Reporter: Nathan Mittler > Assignee: Nathan Mittler > Fix For: 2.2 > > Attachments: amqcpp-perf1.patch, amqcpp-perf1v2.patch, bench1.cpp, bench2.cpp, DataInputStream.patch, DataOutputStreamv0.patch, patch Results.xls > > > Do a performance analysis on openwire vs stomp. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.