Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: 146.232.64.12 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of fullung@gmail.com)
Message-ID: <001201c7a9e2$a92fbe90$0100a8c0@sun.ac.za>
From: "Albert Strasheim" <fullung@gmail.com>
To: <dev@activemq.apache.org>
References: <20070524201840.GA13624@dogbert.sdsl.sun.ac.za>
 <20070531221159.GA15760@dogbert.sdsl.sun.ac.za>
 <af2843cd0706061516p48eceb75k4cd0acc0fb0364c0@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consumers, noLocal, Stomp and Openwire
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:35:36 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello all

Thanks for the feedback. The mistake was on my end.

I was creating two consumers on the same Stomp connection, the first with 
noLocal=false and the second with noLocal=true. Because I was using Stomp, 
only the first consumer's settings have any effect (same thing as with 
selectors).

When I changed my code to only create one consumer with noLocal=true, things 
worked as expected, i.e., my consumer didn't receive message sent by the 
producer on the same connection.

Cheers,

Albert

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hiram Chirino" <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
To: <dev@activemq.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: Consumers, noLocal, Stomp and Openwire


> Technically, the no local option is supported on the STOMP subscribe
> frame so I'm not sure why it's not supported by the c++ client.
>
> On 5/31/07, Albert Strasheim <13640887@sun.ac.za> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Does anybody have any thoughts on this? I'd like to get a final answer
>> so that I can write the tests for my Python wrapper for AMQCPP
>> accordingly.