activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] change the namespace URI in 5.0 onwards to map to spring URIs
Date Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:40:02 GMT
good points.

On 6/15/07, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > I think we should include a version number in there. JUST in case in
> > ActiveMQ 6.0 we decide to get radical with the xml configuration and
> > make it not compatible with 5.0.  We would not want the old 5.0
> > clients pulling down the xsd as the 6.0 clients.
>
> We could always just come up with a new namespace URI (with added
> version) if we decide to go there in ActiveMQ 6.x. Picking a
> version-less URI doesn't preclude us from adding a version in there
> later on if we find we need it.
>
> But given there's little likelihood of major XML surgery for some time
> to come; I'm totally cool with following Spring's lead on the use of
> URIs and XSD locations...
>
> * the XSD location is mandatory in spring 2.0 XML; and so specifies
> the versioning
>
> * the URI can then be a simple URI without version info and map to a
> directory of all the actual physical XSD versions.
>
> --
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Mime
View raw message