activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Ritchie" <ritch...@apache.org>
Subject Re: NMS
Date Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:43:18 GMT
On 11/06/07, Paul Fremantle <pzfreo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hiram
>
>  While I know that its possible to argue that there is commonality
> amongst messaging systems, I think the following list of core
> interfaces might just seem a teeny tiny bit similar.
>
> JMS                    NMS
> BytesMessage    IBytesMessage
> Connection          IConnection
> ConnectionFactory       IConnectionFactory
> Destination            IDestination
> MapMessage      IMapMessage
> Message            IMessage
> MessageConsumer IMessageConsumer
> MessageProducer IMessageProducer
> Queue                  IQueue
> Session                ISession
> TextMessage        ITextMessage
> Topic                    ITopic
>
> Paul
> On 6/11/07, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 6/11/07, Arnaud Simon <asimon@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > According to the discussion we have had on the ActiveMQ mailing list, it
> > > looks as if it is impossible to make a decision on whether implementing
> > > NMS is legal or not.
> > >
> > > Even the ActiveMQ guys cannot agree.
> >
> > All the ActiveMQ guys seem to be of the opinion that NMS is legal.
> > Please stop the FUD.
> > If you guys want FUD, please consider that the same folks who
> > developed NMS helped develop the AMQP specification so the same
> > alleged 'taint' that is being claimed against NMS would also apply to
> > AMQP.
> >
> > > As a potential Qpid implementation
> > > of NMS would be hosted by their project they should decide whether this
> > > is useful to have one and also take responsibility for potential legal
> > > aspects.
> > >
> > > Arnaud
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 15:56 +0100, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> > > > Take a look at this - it might amuse you
> > > >
> > > > http://smallprint.netzoo.net/reag/
> > > >
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > > > On 6/6/07, Rupert Smith <rupertlssmith@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Great! My infallable plan for world domination:
> > > > >
> > > > > "By opening this email, you agree that you have read, understood,
and will
> > > > > comply with all of the terms
> > > > > and conditions set forth herein"
> > > > >
> > > > > You will, pass this on to everyone you know.
> > > > > Agree to everything I say from now on.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
>
>
> --
> Paul Fremantle
> Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> paul@wso2.com
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>

As I understand it Cliff has done a lot of work for Apache on
licensing. Cliff can you provide some legal insight?

Cheers
-- 
Martin Ritchie

Mime
View raw message