Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36777 invoked from network); 25 May 2007 15:16:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 May 2007 15:16:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 14571 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2007 15:16:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 14437 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2007 15:16:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 14428 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2007 15:16:32 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 08:16:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.227] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 08:16:26 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so402874wxd for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 08:16:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WOFNz9xUpliCaMMX90glKWY0/sknD7wxn8XHZLtrq/UTF5aHqeaWx8OfXEekXkRw+1p38KDbgjGQ/k379HYLNj4RlcisfXLsm1wBjicy14n8umwq9B8twSo7Zc+cozlqmJwJGdBAZPRLxf0jqkxDrOWjkMxb+nGl1hKtxFfcG/A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YH9mxMXC4tcS62ZeMWOkNRXZHE2NYteAv2D2WjKGdw2x1O0s2dNsNZYYs04VEqLTkvTCP36tbbWxQcoYqDaK1aEcXDxDfOV8Rt2J7kx4ZtKPQkyPEdr1d+l62gQdPv18DE/ykuInP2VZ964eUlejYcrXLAGZgoUpOGWCRYAYS30= Received: by 10.90.79.6 with SMTP id c6mr2402994agb.1180106166317; Fri, 25 May 2007 08:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.105.5 with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 08:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:16:06 +0100 From: "James Strachan" To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 4.2 and IBM JRE 1.4 In-Reply-To: <50467.159.53.78.142.1180105329.squirrel@www.lse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <60475.159.53.78.142.1180103649.squirrel@www.lse.com> <50467.159.53.78.142.1180105329.squirrel@www.lse.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5/25/07, David D. Lucas wrote: > Thanks for the quick response. I will try the retrotranslator first. > > I did not explain my intent in the other question. > > I want the ability for each ActiveMQ "instance" to use the same database > tables for persistence message store and retrieval. Afraid not.. http://activemq.apache.org/can-two-brokers-share-the-same-database.html -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/