Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25931 invoked from network); 25 May 2007 15:02:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 May 2007 15:02:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 78837 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2007 15:02:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 78816 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2007 15:02:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 78807 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2007 15:02:37 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 08:02:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.86.89.65] (HELO elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.65) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 08:02:32 -0700 Received: from [65.40.135.24] (helo=mail.lse.com) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HrbIw-0002yQ-Rf for dev@activemq.apache.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 11:02:11 -0400 Received: by mail.lse.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id E4CBE24958; Fri, 25 May 2007 11:02:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 159.53.78.142 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ddlucas) by www.lse.com with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 11:02:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <50467.159.53.78.142.1180105329.squirrel@www.lse.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:02:09 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 4.2 and IBM JRE 1.4 From: "David D. Lucas" To: In-Reply-To: References: <60475.159.53.78.142.1180103649.squirrel@www.lse.com> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ELNK-Trace: 2317b908fb6ab65c74bf435c0eb9d47850a04f4c739a9e72dacc96ee671c7d2148ab746ca4c6e5e5350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.40.135.24 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the quick response. I will try the retrotranslator first. I did not explain my intent in the other question. I want the ability for each ActiveMQ "instance" to use the same database tables for persistence message store and retrieval. The question is can I do that and have any persistent message appear to one or more of the other brokers running on different containers assuming I put a message to the same named queue? I want to deploy the broker embedded to my web container and use the database as a way to "distribute" messages. Will the naming and locking defined in the database persistent store mechanism allow multiple brokers to point to that store and retrieve messages from it? Is that more clear or foggier? :-) Thanks again, Dave