Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32123 invoked from network); 10 May 2007 19:34:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 May 2007 19:34:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 76840 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2007 19:34:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 76765 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2007 19:34:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 76735 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2007 19:34:27 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 May 2007 12:34:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 May 2007 12:34:19 -0700 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HmEOl-0004f1-85 for dev@activemq.apache.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 12:33:59 -0700 Message-ID: <10419992.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 12:33:59 -0700 (PDT) From: janstey To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [CAMEL] Simple patch In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: janstey@gmail.com References: <10418032.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Aha, I know what happened! The patch should have been applied to the parent pom, *not* the cxf pom. Thats why the build failed :) I would revert the last commit and re-patch. Sorry for the confusion! Cheers, Jon James.Strachan wrote: > > On 5/10/07, janstey wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The CXF module wasn't even compiling so I figured I should investigate :) >> >> - Updated to use the 2.0-incubator-RC release of CXF, as it should be >> more >> stable. If you guys want to use the latest trunk CXF it is at version >> 2.0-incubator-SNAPSHOT. >> - Added default install goal to parent pom... I'm lazy so all I want to >> type >> is 'mvn' >> - Added fastinstall profile to skip tests if you just wanna compile the >> code. > > Awesome thanks! Patch applied. (I found first time I applied the patch > the build failed; it turned out there was a missing version ID in the > pom which I fixed up). > > I wonder if moving the fastinstall / default install goal into the > parent pom would still work; then all modules would work the same way? > > >> By the way, nice work!!! Using DSL for EIP is a great idea! > > Many thanks! > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-CAMEL--Simple-patch-tf3723060s2354.html#a10419992 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.