+1 :)
James Strachan wrote:
> The volume of Camel related mails are rising and increasingly Camel
> folks are talking about stuff thats unrelated to ActiveMQ. Given how
> busy the ActiveMQ lists are (particularly the user lists) I'm starting
> to worry about missing Camel related traffic in the deluge of ActiveMQ
> related user mail.
>
> So I'm thinking its worth having separate mailing lists for Camel
> related traffic which would also ease the email burden on forks using
> either code bases.
>
> [ ] +1 to create camel-dev, camel-user, camel-commits mailing lists
> [ ] -1 I disagree because: _________
>
>
> Here's my +1
>
|