activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Question on the Openwire Generator
Date Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:00:57 GMT
+1

On 4/23/07, Nathan Mittler <nathan.mittler@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 4/23/07, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> >
> > This sounds good to me.
> >
> > On 4/23/07, Timothy Bish <tim.bish@sensis.com> wrote:
> > > Hey Guys
> > >
> > > This morning I was starting to look at submitting the openwire
> > > generation classes from ActiveMQ-CPP into the openwire generator when a
> > > thought occurred to me and I wanted to run the idea by you guys to see
> > > what you thought.
> > >
> > > Currently all the projects that have openwire generator scripts place
> > > all their openwire generator scripts in the activemq-openwire-genertor
> > > artifact.  So for instance there are java classes in the Openwire
> > > generator artifact for the Openwire-CPP project that has now be moved to
> > > the sandbox as nobody is maintaining it.  So it seems to me like it
> > > would probably be better to have the projects themselves create an
> > > artifact that is dependent on the activemq-openwire-generator artifact
> > > and include their own Openwire Generation classes there, making use of
> > > the base functionality provided in the current package.
> > >
> > > So I was thinking that I'd have ActiveMQ-CPP create an artifact called
> > > activemqcpp-openwire-generator which was dependent on the
> > > activemq-openwire-generator and then use that in our main pom.xml as the
> > > dependency for the ant task we currently have in place.  This way the
> > > code specific to the Project for generating the Openwire classes would
> > > live and die with its own project, not with the main ActiveMQ
> > > distribution.  This way when a project like the Openwire-CPP one for
> > > example stops being supported, its openwire scripts don't hang around in
> > > the activemq openwire generator artifact.
> > >
> > > What do you guys think?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Tim.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
>


-- 
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message