activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Stomp and durable-subscriber-name
Date Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:31:17 GMT
On 4/18/07, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Alvaro Carrasco <alvaro@epliant.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Its purely a case that the Stomp+JMS came later. We really could do
> > > with revving Stomp to 1.0 or 1.1 to tidy up a few headers we'd used.
> > >
> > > I think the latest ActiveMQ should support the cleaner header names
> > > from Stomp+JMS (if it doesn't we can fix it easily).
> >
> > Fair enough.
> >
> > Would it be a good idea to actually somehow embed StompConnect?
> > That way we're not duplicating effort...
>
> It might be - it'd certainly be less code to maintain; though the
> native Stomp support in ActiveMQ is at a lower level; so can be more
> efficient (e.g. not requiring a thread per session etc).

BTW one other difference is StompConnect only exposes pure JMS
features; whereas the native support of Stomp in ActiveMQ exposes
pretty much all of the features in ActiveMQ as extensions

-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message