activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mittler, Nathan" <nathan.mitt...@sensis.com>
Subject RE: AMQCPP Openwire much slower than Stomp?
Date Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:23:49 GMT
BTW, has anyone run the same test with a Java client to verify that it is indeed an OpenWire
thing and not an activemq-cpp specific thing?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teemu Torma [mailto:teemu@torma.org] 
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 6:43 PM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AMQCPP Openwire much slower than Stomp?
> 
> On Thursday 19 April 2007, Timothy Bish wrote:
> > As of last night I have submitted all the changes to implement 
> > allowing TCP_NODELAY to be set, along with some unit tests.  If you 
> > haven't grabbed trunk in a day or so, you won't have all those 
> > changes.
> >
> > We could default it to on if we find its at the root of some of the 
> > performance issues.
> 
> +1 for making it default, also on the broker side.
> 
> I haven't seen any major performance issues apart from 
> TCP_NODELAY not being enabled.  And only scenario I can think 
> of when Nagle's algorithm helps is sending asynchronously 
> small messages, which I think is not the most common usage.  
> 
> Teemu
> 

Mime
View raw message