Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27805 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2007 07:43:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2007 07:43:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 49945 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2007 07:43:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 49920 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2007 07:43:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 49911 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2007 07:43:55 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:43:55 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.235 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.235] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.235) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:43:44 -0800 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f1so947940nzc for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:43:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=C9XBvgA4UVqfUUCj1806inX5vMVmwm2kPZcTbAqOshSQxs/oVM4qNjStq4Ruyyux9UJZqgB8sZLiKIhWij7ye322tvfkIamC3+q9jjILl7QZ5F93nsI+L5HBcLsjRaBgqbl2wMoTSOENn75VbHjbvFet6A0Sty7SBX0rPhZcenQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=YVE5c88Q+IBxOwgVt37l7zEes9kXc9UUbMDtwD+3J+AtD9jeuqt6TnvWEZ3IrUyYg2vQyyYJoZBaoa9IfXSV539YS4fuxFXHvd1iQ3blYig3KFXsItMd6gmtUp9nLYxyCc+yL8XVmIFK+xEUou7WjfsToO1A8eLyW9XyQmeckWs= Received: by 10.114.153.18 with SMTP id a18mr248146wae.1172389402823; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:43:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.202.7 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:43:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:43:17 -0500 From: "Hiram Chirino" Sender: chirino@gmail.com To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Do we really have to set a timestamp on the broker? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 56ee65e6f0a9b9a2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Rob, do you remember why added the following feature? http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=376260 Setting the time on a message can break JMS spec compliance, plus it forces us to have the overhead of getting the system time on every message sent. I was hoping we could roll this one back. -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com