activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Do we really have to set a timestamp on the broker?
Date Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:13:56 GMT
Going to move this to a broker plugin for now then.

On 2/25/07, Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:
> exactly! but its sunday mornin :) - don't expect clarity of thought -
> yet!
>
> On 25 Feb 2007, at 08:04, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
> > Why not optional with a different property, so that the spec
> > behavior is always consistent, but users can still get the custom
> > data they need if the broker has some flag flipped on?
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> > On Feb 24, 2007, at 11:54 PM, Rob Davies wrote:
> >
> >> It was requested by a some users - they wanted to compare messages
> >> from different producers on different machines by time sent - and
> >> as the clients clocks aren't in sync, they really needed the
> >> timestamp set on the broker. I guess the best thing to do would to
> >> make it optional, off by default
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >>
> >> Rob
> >>
> >> On 25 Feb 2007, at 07:43, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >>
> >>> Rob, do you remember why added the following feature?
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=376260
> >>>
> >>> Setting the time on a message can break JMS spec compliance, plus it
> >>> forces us to have the overhead of getting the system time on every
> >>> message sent.   I was hoping we could roll this one back.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Hiram
> >>>
> >>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >>
> >
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Mime
View raw message