activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Do we really have to set a timestamp on the broker?
Date Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:09:03 GMT
exactly! but its sunday mornin :) - don't expect clarity of thought -  
yet!

On 25 Feb 2007, at 08:04, Jason Dillon wrote:

> Why not optional with a different property, so that the spec  
> behavior is always consistent, but users can still get the custom  
> data they need if the broker has some flag flipped on?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2007, at 11:54 PM, Rob Davies wrote:
>
>> It was requested by a some users - they wanted to compare messages  
>> from different producers on different machines by time sent - and  
>> as the clients clocks aren't in sync, they really needed the  
>> timestamp set on the broker. I guess the best thing to do would to  
>> make it optional, off by default
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On 25 Feb 2007, at 07:43, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>
>>> Rob, do you remember why added the following feature?
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=376260
>>>
>>> Setting the time on a message can break JMS spec compliance, plus it
>>> forces us to have the overhead of getting the system time on every
>>> message sent.   I was hoping we could roll this one back.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>
>


Mime
View raw message