activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mittler, Nathan" <nathan.mitt...@sensis.com>
Subject RE: mini sites for NMS and CMS projects
Date Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:35:20 GMT
The APIs should definitely be implementation agnostic.  

The activemq-cpp implementation of CMS for Stomp, however, uses the
ActiveMQ extensions, so it won't work with just any old stomp broker.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 1:55 PM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mini sites for NMS and CMS projects
> 
> On 2/19/07, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > Great point.  So should we try to keep these CMS/NMS spaces 
> > implementation agnostic?
> 
> Yeah. e.g. NMS can (just about) talk to any pure Stomp 
> broker, ditto the CMS as well. So we should definitely try to 
> make NMS and CMS talk to any broker.
> -- 
> 
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> 

Mime
View raw message