activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Do we really have to set a timestamp on the broker?
Date Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:04:21 GMT
Why not optional with a different property, so that the spec behavior  
is always consistent, but users can still get the custom data they  
need if the broker has some flag flipped on?

--jason


On Feb 24, 2007, at 11:54 PM, Rob Davies wrote:

> It was requested by a some users - they wanted to compare messages  
> from different producers on different machines by time sent - and  
> as the clients clocks aren't in sync, they really needed the  
> timestamp set on the broker. I guess the best thing to do would to  
> make it optional, off by default
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
>
> On 25 Feb 2007, at 07:43, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
>> Rob, do you remember why added the following feature?
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=376260
>>
>> Setting the time on a message can break JMS spec compliance, plus it
>> forces us to have the overhead of getting the system time on every
>> message sent.   I was hoping we could roll this one back.
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>


Mime
View raw message