Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77988 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2006 18:40:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Nov 2006 18:40:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 86674 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2006 18:40:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 86658 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2006 18:40:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 86649 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2006 18:40:14 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:40:14 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.172] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:39:59 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so255588ugc for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:39:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=fb6pMDz5PFog5nZP+8r31ZXugDx5oi26zCuDxNkkNBCS7e+LYH8d/jBdQGVjq/gQ/86wJMk/b84lfc+etMBFGTXkG+X2mgrxxmp0V3jGoc+j9TZagQUOnVuRlPrDKL35E8ADG48Yws12P0LV0ZMGexk2GmMoejfmAI8vDsoQH9Q= Received: by 10.78.146.11 with SMTP id t11mr585990hud.1163615976927; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:39:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.142.5 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:39:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:39:36 -0500 From: "Hiram Chirino" Sender: chirino@gmail.com To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Switching to ActiveMQ 4.2 to Java 5??? In-Reply-To: <455B5E24.7040901@Stolsvik.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <455B5E24.7040901@Stolsvik.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 469d572b403b8114 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/15/06, Endre St=F8lsvik wrote: > Hiram Chirino wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement > > for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do this since Java 5 > > has a much better set of concurrent implementation. > > > > We can keep the 4.1.x branch alive as the Java 1.4 compatible version. > > Also I have a feeling that once we switch to Java 5, someone will > > figure out how to use retrotranslator to make our Java 5 binaries also > > run on Java 1.4. But I doubt anybody will make any efforts to look > > into that until we actually jump to Java 5. > > > > Rather big move for a minor version - why not call it ActiveMQ 5 instead > (It'll even align!). > lol.. good point. But I'd hate to have big increases without big functionality changes especially if the clients are still compatible with the 4.x stuff. > Then keep ActiveMQ 4.x on 1.4. > > Regards, > Endre. > --=20 Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com