Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.201 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=LbNbtEvE/zdcBMyZvNrDxVNA4VDT5Ao0LBKPQgJ3YyMAOh1l9dIotwE0J+zEwbPOYpd8o7AS+oEt04eqIxfFaNQqvSQLFPQ9ZDSUstDKyN/+Zao08KxwKN+q9NF9yVLCRhH0fkGp1oHJyQm03nXY4zKzjoam+ehDlIYe0F2adjg=
Message-ID: <af2843cd0611140906r314c690dq28d88b06937735c8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:06:00 -0500
From: "Hiram Chirino" <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
Sender: chirino@gmail.com
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ POM
In-Reply-To: <b23ecedc0611140903k15244a24o8df08d49962429e5@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <af2843cd0611140448u330618eah7327838ff24bf0ea@mail.gmail.com>
	 <00f601c7080b$c77b5680$9cf1a8c0@ncanonizado>
	 <b23ecedc0611140845m3f53d86buf906d5480f2574db@mail.gmail.com>
	 <af2843cd0611140852l1bb55719w5187f8a77b6b4097@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b23ecedc0611140903k15244a24o8df08d49962429e5@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/14/06, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the main problem is that users will never
> download newest versions.  IMHO, this would be a bad
> idea.

yeah.

>
> On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Fritz!
> >
> > I knew there had to be a reason that I was just not aware of.  What do
> > you think would be the downsides of not using the special "SNAPSHOT"
> > handling that maven provides?  What if we tagged our SNAPSHOT builds
> > with something like like "DEVELOPMENT" instead of "SNAPSHOT".
> >
> > I'm guessing that problem would go away, but what other ones would we get?
> >
> > On 11/14/06, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > This is also my experience.
> > > If we just use the real version 4.2-SNAPSHOT
> > > for example, it should also work and maven
> > > should be able to change (*nearly*) all these
> > > occurrences when using the release plugin.
> > >
> > > I say nearly, because in ServiceMix, there are
> > > some edge cases where this fail (when including
> > > the version in files other than pom.xml like artifacts
> > > resources for example).
> > >
> > > On 11/14/06, Fritz Oconer <foconer@exist.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I added ${activemq-version} instead of ${project.version} basically as a
> > > > workaround for build failures due to differences in timestamp. If we use
> > > > ${project.version} then it will require all activemq type artifacts
> > > > (specified as <dependency> in the parent pom.xml) to have the same timestamp
> > > > as the parent. This becomes an issue when nightly-build deploy fails after
> > > > some of the modules have been deployed causing some activemq modules to have
> > > > different timestamp as the parent. We can change this back to using
> > > > project.version but we need to make sure that nightly-build always deploys
> > > > successfully or I wonder if there is another workaround for this?
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-956
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Fritz
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Hiram Chirino" <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
> > > > To: <activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 8:48 PM
> > > > Subject: ActiveMQ POM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Howdy,
> > > > >
> > > > > I was wondering if anybody knows why we are using
> > > > > "${activemq-version}" instead of "${project.version}" in our ActiveMQ
> > > > > poms??  When doing a release build, it's easy to forget that you need
> > > > > to updated the version in to places.  Can't we just use the
> > > > > "${project.version}" variable??
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Hiram
> > > > >
> > > > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Guillaume Nodet
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com