+1 with or without retrotranslator
-dain
On Nov 15, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement
> for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do this since Java 5
> has a much better set of concurrent implementation.
>
> We can keep the 4.1.x branch alive as the Java 1.4 compatible version.
> Also I have a feeling that once we switch to Java 5, someone will
> figure out how to use retrotranslator to make our Java 5 binaries also
> run on Java 1.4. But I doubt anybody will make any efforts to look
> into that until we actually jump to Java 5.
>
> So what do you say? Shall we switch ??
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
|