Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47106 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2006 23:03:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2006 23:03:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 55123 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2006 23:03:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 55013 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2006 23:03:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 55004 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2006 23:03:02 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:03:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.187] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:03:01 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c29so1589903nfb for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:02:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=eKNDKrOMfdFxiSLq6cDUd+sShSLlGvgtyoaKGMA8SkGqc03Ka3d/+yGoheL1t+RcHfByyXLoTvEXJdXDlIhQdAEpYJECAl88h6qPWBPvvSKyeVjfbDRd/cfJ+fomJuhd+iBK4Nx1yMz2b7Y+2SuM+kBpdItIVthWrpsqVJOHIQ4= Received: by 10.78.131.8 with SMTP id e8mr4343635hud; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.142.5 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:02:39 -0500 From: "Hiram Chirino" Sender: chirino@gmail.com To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Interop between AMQ versions? In-Reply-To: <487A238A-3137-4FBD-ADC4-0B2D65AFF496@planet57.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_30599_16392277.1160780559935" References: <2C048691-4AE0-4DCB-866C-B6ED1CE70269@planet57.com> <487A238A-3137-4FBD-ADC4-0B2D65AFF496@planet57.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 90568ee7a15ecce5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_30599_16392277.1160780559935 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline We have been through 4 RCs so far. I thought that one was going to be the last. maybe in 1 or 2 more weeks. On 10/13/06, Jason Dillon wrote: > > When is 4.0.2 gonna go final? Docs suggest its still being voted upon. > > --jason > > > On Oct 13, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > Yeah.. there was a small bug in the 4.0.1 code that causes it to not > > negotiate properly with future versions of the protocol. > > This bug has been fixed in the 4.0.2 version. And 4.0.2 should be > > able to > > connect to 4.0.1 and 4.1 versions of the broker just fine. > > > > If this is not the case, let me know! > > > > On 10/13/06, Jason Dillon wrote: > >> > >> Hey, just curious if there is a plan (or maybe it already exists) to > >> provide support for interoperability between AMQ versions? I ask, > >> because I recently started working on GBuild again, which uses AMQ... > >> I setup a 4.0.1 broker, but my clients were using the 4.1-incubator* > >> and 4.0.1 broker was puking out CNFE exceptions: > >> > >> > >> Exception in thread "ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:52264" > >> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid version: 2, could not > >> load org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.MarshallerFactory > >> at org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.setVersion > >> (OpenWireFormat.java:329) > >> at > >> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.renegociatWireFormat > >> (OpenWireFormat.java:569) > >> at > >> org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.onCommand > >> (WireFormatNegotiator.java:100) > >> at org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.onCommand > >> (InactivityMonitor.java:122) > >> at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume > >> (TransportSupport.java:87) > >> at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run > >> (TcpTransport.java:143) > >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613) > >> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > >> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.MarshallerFactory > >> at org.apache.activemq.util.ClassLoading.loadClass > >> (ClassLoading.java:104) > >> at org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.setVersion > >> (OpenWireFormat.java:327) > >> ... 6 more > >> > >> > >> I think I am probably going to just embed a broker in each GBuild > >> node and use network connectors from the slaves back to the master > >> node for connectivity so that its easier to use the m2 deps from 4.1- > >> incubator* to keep things in sync (among other reasons). > >> > >> * * * > >> > >> But, just wondering if there was a plan for broader interop? > >> > >> --jason > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Hiram > > > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com ------=_Part_30599_16392277.1160780559935--