Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <6831020.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christopher_Ong <yinjie50@hotmail.com>
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release of Activemq 4.0.2
In-Reply-To: <6829253.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6791875.post@talk.nabble.com> <6827227.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <6829253.post@talk.nabble.com>


The problem is the expired message won't automatically been removed from it's
specific queue if using 4.0.1 whereas 4.0.2 having d feature that the
expired msg will be removed from d queue if there is new consumer consumed
the other msg inside d queue.


hbruch wrote:
> 
> Hi Christopher,
> 
> sorry, if my response to your question concerning message expiration might
> have been misleading, but expiration handling did not change from 4.0.1 to
> 4.0.2. You should see the behaviour I described with AMQ 4.0.1 as well.
> 
> Regards,
> Holger
>  
> 
> Christopher_Ong wrote:
>> 
>> Hello, is anyone can clarify my doubt? Thanks in advance.
>> 
>> Christopher_Ong wrote:
>>> 
>>> May I know when is the projected official release of Activemq 4.0.2
>>> (because I prefer it's feature of auto remove of expired message where
>>> 4.0.1 can't do that)? Thanks
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Release-of-Activemq-4.0.2-tf2435693.html#a6831020
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.