Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23003 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2006 12:44:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Oct 2006 12:44:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 96487 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2006 12:44:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 96374 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2006 12:44:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 96365 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2006 12:44:15 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:44:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.198] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (209.237.227.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:44:14 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FC57142E1 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <21458526.1161175396877.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:43:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "james strachan (JIRA)" To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (AMQ-952) .Net Client ConnectionFactory requires additional configurable attributes In-Reply-To: <13346057.1159796769080.JavaMail.root@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-952?page=comments#action_37228 ] james strachan commented on AMQ-952: ------------------------------------ So the only things left for this I think are closeTimeout and connectTimeout. For closeTimeout, we currently are not waiting for a receipt to come back from the broker when we send a ShutdownInfo - which seems fine to me. The Java client will do a timeout based request-response up to the closeTimeout - am not sure how useful that is to implement in .Net though. For connectTimeout, in Java we set that as a property on the Socket class when doing a Connect() - I don't see any way to do something similar on .Net. Though the SendTimeout and ReceiveTimeout properties can be set via the URI notation of transport.socket.sendTimeout=1234 etc > .Net Client ConnectionFactory requires additional configurable attributes > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMQ-952 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-952 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: NMS (C# client) > Reporter: Rob Lugt > Priority: Minor > > The Java Client has a rich set of configuration options, which should also be available on the .Net client. > As a mimimum I believe we need:- > closeTimeout > retroactiveConsumer > Is it also worth considering a connectTimeout property - or should this be transport specific? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira