Cool :)
I missed them, I was looking at the 4.0.2 tag ..

On 10/5/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/5/06, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What about adding an xbean annotation on
> > the ActiveMQConnectionFactory ? This is
> > a commonly used object and it would
> > benefit from an xbean based syntax imho.
>
> Good idea - though I'd added them to the connection factory
> implementations in the spring package - which adds some spring-aware
> helpers (like using the bean name in the generated JMS clientID - so
> if you use different IDs in your spring files, you'll get more helpful
> clientIDs when debugging).
>
> I was working with a customer a little while back who had lots of
> spring configuration files and they found it helpful to name the JMS
> clients so they could easily see what app was connecting etc.
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>


-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet