activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Interop between AMQ versions?
Date Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:02:39 GMT
We have been through 4 RCs so far.  I thought that one was going to be the
last.  maybe in 1 or 2 more weeks.

On 10/13/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>
> When is 4.0.2 gonna go final?  Docs suggest its still being voted upon.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Oct 13, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> > Yeah.. there was a small bug in the 4.0.1 code that causes it to not
> > negotiate properly with future versions of the protocol.
> > This bug has been fixed in the 4.0.2 version.  And 4.0.2 should be
> > able to
> > connect to 4.0.1 and 4.1 versions of the broker just fine.
> >
> > If this is not the case, let me know!
> >
> > On 10/13/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey, just curious if there is a plan (or maybe it already exists) to
> >> provide support for interoperability between AMQ versions?  I ask,
> >> because I recently started working on GBuild again, which uses AMQ...
> >> I setup a 4.0.1 broker, but my clients were using the 4.1-incubator*
> >> and 4.0.1 broker was puking out CNFE exceptions:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >> Exception in thread "ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:52264"
> >> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid version: 2, could not
> >> load org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.MarshallerFactory
> >>          at org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.setVersion
> >> (OpenWireFormat.java:329)
> >>          at
> >> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.renegociatWireFormat
> >> (OpenWireFormat.java:569)
> >>          at
> >> org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.onCommand
> >> (WireFormatNegotiator.java:100)
> >>          at org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.onCommand
> >> (InactivityMonitor.java:122)
> >>          at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume
> >> (TransportSupport.java:87)
> >>          at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run
> >> (TcpTransport.java:143)
> >>          at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
> >> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> >> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.MarshallerFactory
> >>          at org.apache.activemq.util.ClassLoading.loadClass
> >> (ClassLoading.java:104)
> >>          at org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.setVersion
> >> (OpenWireFormat.java:327)
> >>          ... 6 more
> >> </snip>
> >>
> >> I think I am probably going to just embed a broker in each GBuild
> >> node and use network connectors from the slaves back to the master
> >> node for connectivity so that its easier to use the m2 deps from 4.1-
> >> incubator* to keep things in sync (among other reasons).
> >>
> >>   * * *
> >>
> >> But, just wondering if there was a plan for broader interop?
> >>
> >> --jason
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message