Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender;
        b=gis3QLFl5tvh/Xza9IptIuJllm4vKuGirHaAnHhnsieVYihudCy24zL5t5RwpWMngkuuPHcK9emOGVMhexN0dpxug1d5W2e1mqzMJBM5CV2d3Usw9FY9WDJ41kjv6NCHUpCwoNpQdxl9+52R7DmZd9wkUvIPnbSLUcLA3mzKL1A=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <bc2b53c50608241356n4c186d06nb86a678c7c6462d8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <bc2b53c50608241356n4c186d06nb86a678c7c6462d8@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <167E0DF5-31F3-46EF-BDBD-393A996AF72B@planet57.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
Subject: Re: Coding style, specifically 80 characters
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:10:23 -0700
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sender: Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com>

I think the 80 char limit is antiquated... now that most folks have  
displays that can quite easily display more than 80 columns.   
Limiting lines to 80 tends to force folks to artificially reformat  
code which just uglies things up.

--jason


On Aug 24, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Sepand M wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> Do you have a coding style that I should go by?
> Specifically, do you use the 80 chars/line limit?
> I see a lot of code that doesn't, so I haven't, but it's bugging me
> more and more by the second.
>
> Regards,
> Sepand