activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Where to put new Callback and CallbackHandler classes
Date Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:32:28 GMT
I've created http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-907 to track this.

On 8/31/06, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> I'm 100% behind making activeio an optional module.  I'll start
> working on moving some core classes that are in activeio to activemq
> so that it is not needed to run.  Right now the only real
> functionality that it provides that is optional is the journal
> implementation.
>
> Everything else that is use are just abstract interfaces, and I think
> those need to be moved/copied to ActiveMQ.
>
> On 8/25/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/25/06, Sepand M <sepandm@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > It does since the CertificateAuthenticationBroker I'm making will need
> > > to use the CertificateCallbacks.
> > > I have put the classes in jaas (core already has a dependancy on jaas
> > > so that's not a problem). I do think the other callbacks should go in
> > > jass now, but I don't want to touch your stuff since I'm not sure
> > > when/if you will accept my patch.
> >
> > Since its all JAAS/security related and to avoid recursive
> > dependencies, how about putting the CertificateAuthenticationBroker in
> > the activemq-jaas module too? The idea behind activemq-core is that it
> > has as few dependencies as possible.
> >
> > Which reminds me - it might be nice to remove the dependency on
> > activeio and make that an optional module.
> > --
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Mime
View raw message