activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Where to put new Callback and CallbackHandler classes
Date Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:36:33 GMT
+1 to that!
On 31 Aug 2006, at 18:25, Hiram Chirino wrote:

> I'm 100% behind making activeio an optional module.  I'll start
> working on moving some core classes that are in activeio to activemq
> so that it is not needed to run.  Right now the only real
> functionality that it provides that is optional is the journal
> implementation.
>
> Everything else that is use are just abstract interfaces, and I think
> those need to be moved/copied to ActiveMQ.
>
> On 8/25/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8/25/06, Sepand M <sepandm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > It does since the CertificateAuthenticationBroker I'm making  
>> will need
>> > to use the CertificateCallbacks.
>> > I have put the classes in jaas (core already has a dependancy on  
>> jaas
>> > so that's not a problem). I do think the other callbacks should  
>> go in
>> > jass now, but I don't want to touch your stuff since I'm not sure
>> > when/if you will accept my patch.
>>
>> Since its all JAAS/security related and to avoid recursive
>> dependencies, how about putting the  
>> CertificateAuthenticationBroker in
>> the activemq-jaas module too? The idea behind activemq-core is  
>> that it
>> has as few dependencies as possible.
>>
>> Which reminds me - it might be nice to remove the dependency on
>> activeio and make that an optional module.
>> --
>>
>> James
>> -------
>> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com


Mime
View raw message