+1
--jason
On Aug 24, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Sepand M wrote:
> Ok, 120 it is.
>
> On 8/24/06, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Agreed.
>> 120 is much more useful :)
>>
>> On 8/24/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I think the 80 char limit is antiquated... now that most folks have
>> > displays that can quite easily display more than 80 columns.
>> > Limiting lines to 80 tends to force folks to artificially reformat
>> > code which just uglies things up.
>> >
>> > --jason
>> >
>> >
>> > On Aug 24, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Sepand M wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi guys,
>> > >
>> > > Do you have a coding style that I should go by?
>> > > Specifically, do you use the 80 chars/line limit?
>> > > I see a lot of code that doesn't, so I haven't, but it's
>> bugging me
>> > > more and more by the second.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Sepand
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>>
>>
|