Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.172 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=b12umqGBCmlQj1NrpMLrGcoox778Qh5fKIjw8x27veZ+QnqVuPLskuYnte7sL9DQ2A96TgA1e7WpREIs3cIp/k77w7oC1uN6r9hbE/mVmi4RCgVC/n1ZIZNSTvJg/lgZoHV22e0+ChWy6g1oUCx010FnHhoQaDBs7gqwTsgz1EY=
Message-ID: <af2843cd0607270701i7776775ei5e7117011583d659@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:01:09 -0400
From: "Hiram Chirino" <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
Sender: chirino@gmail.com
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2
In-Reply-To: <C36E5467-752A-4883-A850-A60BFF813A0A@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_341837_7807301.1154008869012"
References: <af2843cd0607252226s4d48335fn12264989e7a16e9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <C36E5467-752A-4883-A850-A60BFF813A0A@gmail.com>

------=_Part_341837_7807301.1154008869012
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Kevan,

This must be new.  We were distributing multiple license files.  Now that we
need to put it all in 1 license file, do you know how we should handle the
case were the original license was in html format?  Should we reformat it to
be in plain text?  Or should we just paste in the html into the plain text
LICENSE file?

On 7/27/06, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Looks like your base LICENSE and NOTICE files contain only AL 2.0
> license information. Since you're releasing code under multiple
> licenses, according to http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html, all
> license/notice information needs to be placed there.
>
> --kevan
>
> On Jul 26, 2006, at 1:26 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> > Since it was brought up, and folks concurred that it's about time
> > to put out
> > a bug fix release for ActiveMQ, I've put together a binary release of
> > ActiveMQ 4.0.2:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC1/
> > maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Echirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.1-RC1/
> > maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/>
> > Maven 1 and Maven 2 repos for this release can be found at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC1
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Echirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.1-RC1/>
> > Here's the wiki page for the release notes (they should soon get
> > mirrored to
> > the activemq static website) :
> > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0.2+Release
> > <http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0.1+Release>
> > Please vote to approve this release binary
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >
> > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for their
> > blessing to ship this release officially.
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

------=_Part_341837_7807301.1154008869012--