Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.184.239 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer;
        b=LawQAnZwMlhLFQMF7lQ3EITWz23fQbv/q92GgVs3aSJVXIx+DFwYa/vEIRPTp+cxWTHEToQYphc2+HFeIpTrL03Co37XrcbY290DIQhy+kxV/A6bJI1rZmZkDubJ00nCCPLm4yOZqPbtMGXBUALTITAubbri+a0QTYkMz2Ff+PA=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <af2843cd0607270701i7776775ei5e7117011583d659@mail.gmail.com>
References: <af2843cd0607252226s4d48335fn12264989e7a16e9@mail.gmail.com>
 <C36E5467-752A-4883-A850-A60BFF813A0A@gmail.com>
 <af2843cd0607270701i7776775ei5e7117011583d659@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <C71C0E28-3D6A-4981-9408-C8593B613985@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:55:18 -0400
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org


On Jul 27, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:

> Hi Kevan,
>
> This must be new.  We were distributing multiple license files.   
> Now that we
> need to put it all in 1 license file, do you know how we should  
> handle the
> case were the original license was in html format?  Should we  
> reformat it to
> be in plain text?  Or should we just paste in the html into the  
> plain text
> LICENSE file?

I don't know how long the guidelines have been in place.

Personally, I'd want to see the license in plain text format. But  
that's personal opinion. For any authoritative answer, need to ask on  
legal-discuss.

--kevan


>
> On 7/27/06, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Looks like your base LICENSE and NOTICE files contain only AL 2.0
>> license information. Since you're releasing code under multiple
>> licenses, according to http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html, all
>> license/notice information needs to be placed there.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>> On Jul 26, 2006, at 1:26 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>
>> > Since it was brought up, and folks concurred that it's about time
>> > to put out
>> > a bug fix release for ActiveMQ, I've put together a binary  
>> release of
>> > ActiveMQ 4.0.2:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC1/
>> > maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/
>> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Echirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.1-RC1/
>> > maven1/incubator-activemq/distributions/>
>> > Maven 1 and Maven 2 repos for this release can be found at:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC1
>> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Echirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.1-RC1/>
>> > Here's the wiki page for the release notes (they should soon get
>> > mirrored to
>> > the activemq static website) :
>> > http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0.2 
>> +Release
>> > <http://goopen.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+4.0.1 
>> +Release>
>> > Please vote to approve this release binary
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > If this vote passes, then we will then ask the Incubator PMC for  
>> their
>> > blessing to ship this release officially.
>> >
>> > Here's my +1
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > Hiram
>> >
>> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com