activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Should we add large String value support in MapMessage in 4.0.2 ?? re: AMQ-788
Date Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:10:43 GMT
Ok.  look like there was not too much opposition to backporting this so..
I'll go ahead and do it later today.

On 7/11/06, Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 - sounds good to me
> On 11 Jul 2006, at 16:42, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks.
> >
> > In 4.1 we added a patch that add support of handling large string
> > values ( >
> > 32k ) in map messages.  See:
> > http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-788
> >
> > I just wanted to see if you guys think we should backport that to
> > 4.0.2also?
> >
> > The only down side is that a slight incompatibility in marshaling is
> > introduced.  It only affect messages that use string values > 8k.
> > With the
> > patch once a string value is > 8k, we now use a different marshaling
> > strategy that allow for marshaling String values up to 2 gigs.  So
> > if you
> > have <= 4.0.1 clients talking to 4.0.2 clients sending map messages
> > with
> > String values > 8k then the <= 4.0.1 clients may not be able handle
> > the
> > messages from the 4.0.2 clients.
> >
> > I think it's safe enough to add since we did not support large
> > messages
> > anyways in 4.0.1.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message