activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: handling slow consumers on non-persistent topics and AMQ-688
Date Tue, 04 Jul 2006 13:30:29 GMT
These are all good questions.. And that's why I kinda was think a branch
would be good since it would alow folks to go crazy figuring out the best
solution and not have to work about breaking things while the changes are in
progress.

On 7/4/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/4/06, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > The problem is there is a high likelyhood that we will need to also
> extend
> > the MessageStore interface to provide some cursoring ablilities.  So the
> > change is not going to just be sefcontained in the broker region
> package.
>
> Ah I see - in that case I completely agree :).
>
> How about we only make a branch when we decide we have to do some
> major surgery, like changing the MessageStore? Maybe we can do a basic
> spool-to-disk implementation which is not optimal but works without
> major surgery? Or do you think its better to solve this via changing
> the MesaageStore contract, to deal with spooling of non-persistent
> messages anyway?
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>



-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message