activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dhawan, Vikram \(LNG-DAY\)" <vikram.dha...@lexisnexis.com>
Subject RE: Should we add large String value support in MapMessage in 4.0.2 ?? re: AMQ-788
Date Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:30:35 GMT
Can we set message timeout in a stomp client in the situations where
STOMP client is trying to send a message and because of network issues
(FIREWALL or something else) it cant not reach to the AMQ server. 

So instead of trying to send the message indefinitely STOMP client
process will terminate. 

Thanks!

Vik
-----Original Message-----
From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 1:26 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Should we add large String value support in MapMessage in
4.0.2 ?? re: AMQ-788

Great!

Must be nearly time to cut a 4.0.2 release :)

On 7/14/06, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Ok.  look like there was not too much opposition to backporting this
so..
> I'll go ahead and do it later today.
>
> On 7/11/06, Rob Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 - sounds good to me
> > On 11 Jul 2006, at 16:42, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Folks.
> > >
> > > In 4.1 we added a patch that add support of handling large string
> > > values ( >
> > > 32k ) in map messages.  See:
> > > http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-788
> > >
> > > I just wanted to see if you guys think we should backport that to
> > > 4.0.2also?
> > >
> > > The only down side is that a slight incompatibility in marshaling
is
> > > introduced.  It only affect messages that use string values > 8k.
> > > With the
> > > patch once a string value is > 8k, we now use a different
marshaling
> > > strategy that allow for marshaling String values up to 2 gigs.  So
> > > if you
> > > have <= 4.0.1 clients talking to 4.0.2 clients sending map
messages
> > > with
> > > String values > 8k then the <= 4.0.1 clients may not be able
handle
> > > the
> > > messages from the 4.0.2 clients.
> > >
> > > I think it's safe enough to add since we did not support large
> > > messages
> > > anyways in 4.0.1.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Hiram
> > >
> > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message