activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "james strachan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (AMQ-468) Queue load balancing - optionally give highest priority to the local connection, then local broker then networks
Date Mon, 03 Jul 2006 11:01:51 GMT
    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-468?page=comments#action_36504 ] 

james strachan commented on AMQ-468:
------------------------------------

We mght want to weight consumers via

* the session (so replies tend to go to the session which sent a message)
* the connection that sent the message
* VM connections (which are generally cheaper to use)

I guess we might want this to be configurable.

> Queue load balancing - optionally give highest priority to the local connection, then
local broker then networks
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: AMQ-468
>          URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-468
>      Project: ActiveMQ
>         Type: Improvement

>     Reporter: Rob Davies
>      Fix For: 4.1

>
>
> For Queues, as an option assign the highest priority for dispatching to the local connection,
then the local broker, then the cluster etc.
> Right now we favour consumers on the local broker above consumers on remote brokers.
However we should prioritise consumers on the same session, connection or VM transport above
consumers in other processes etc

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message