activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Dillon" <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Re: Maven group id and version change.
Date Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:15:21 GMT
Oh, I did not realize it was a req from the incubator pmc.  They,
putting in the version is defs better than the groupId IMO. Still
kinda lame... but gotta play by the rules na?

--jason


On 7/24/06, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 7/24/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> >
> > The groupId change is good... but you might want to use "4.1-
> > incubator-SNAPSHOT" for a version id that gives better with maven
>
>
>
> Good point.. I think this is what servicemix does too.
>
> version number processing.  Or just call it "4.1-SNAPSHOT" I really
> > don't see much value putting incubator in there at all.
>
>
>
> Including "incubator" in the name of the release artifacts in a requirement
> set by the incubator pmc.  Right now we have been putting it in the groupId
> and also the artifactId of the assembly module.  If we move it to the
> version part we can take it out of the groupId and also the assembly module
> artifactId.
>
>
>
> --jason
> >
> >
> > On Jul 24, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > How would you guys feel if we follow servicemix's lead and switch
> > > to using
> > > the "org.apache.activemq" group id and and "incubator-4.1-SNAPSHOT"
> > > as the
> > > version number in our maven poms?  It something that we will
> > > eventually need
> > > to do any ways, so, I say we might as well do it now.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Hiram
> > >
> > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>

Mime
View raw message