Mailing-List: contact activemq-dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=PrM7BCbIIQJ7InSrPMUkU8KmqVYxRHICWX3CX1VZc1uiyHvKzh4amC9q9XPs46LEZZSAq0QjZL//ArSaSyJNmvAC2i/zKcr/SejsKcB8bv9shmlK7kVzbrqIlOblE1wWZK1TAOiFw1eOWeYtqiYW9jXZ6Bh0Qe1Bay1Sywdnv8Y=
Message-ID: <af2843cd0606141537o74843ce7g15cd68eaf0146e6b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:37:08 -0400
From: "Hiram Chirino" <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
Sender: chirino@gmail.com
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Nested MapMessage
In-Reply-To: <4873966.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4872274.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <af2843cd0606141400g73275624o3318f91aeef9678d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4873966.post@talk.nabble.com>

Could you provide a few sniplets of code for how you think API should look?

On 6/14/06, jhakim <jawaid.hakim@codestreet.com> wrote:
>
> Yes.
>
> MapMessage has the same power and flexibility as XML (the universal
> self-describing data structure) as long as arbitrary nesting is allowed.
> Take away nesting and MapMessage becomes a very simplistic structure that
> cannot easily handle real-world application needs.
>
> In recognition of this fact, many vendors allow nesting of MapMessage - e.g.
> TIBCO EMS. Some vendors, such as SonicMQ provide proprietary APIs when it
> comes to nesting. This, in my opinion, is a very poor design strategy
> because it binds clients too closely with the vendor API.
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Nested-MapMessage-t1788442.html#a4873966
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram