activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: STOMP and JMSType
Date Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:10:38 GMT
ok.

On 6/14/06, Brian McCallister <brianm@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> > So here's a link to everything that is in the spec currently:
> > http://stomp.codehaus.org/Protocol
> >
> > It's a WIKI so you can edit it and improve the spec.  I think that a
> > the big missing piece in the spec is that there is no specification of
> > how STOMP messages get mapped to JMS messages.  Since this is missing,
> > there is no provider independent way of sending JMS messages from
> > STOMP.  Since every implementation could map a STOMP message to JMS
> > messages differently.
> >
> > I think we need to add a "STOMP Message to JMS Message Mapping"
> > section that providers SHOULD comply with if the provider also
> > implements a JMS interface.  The great part is since this is missing,
> > you can make this whatever you want!
>
> Appendix, not part of the spec itself. If for no other reason than
> ActiveMQ will not be compliant as the current hackjob I implemented
> and we are now discussing how to fix is definitely not spec-worthy =)
>
> Once we have a few implementations and people have worked with it we
> can consider moving it from appendix into stomp 1.1 proper.
> Enshrining one technique now would be like enshrining a set of rules
> for O/R mapping eight years ago.
>
> -Brian
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Mime
View raw message